From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 16 17:37:05 2020 Received: (at 40559) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2020 21:37:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39486 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jPCC1-0001Te-Ba for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:37:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:46087) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jPCBz-0001T3-1w for 40559@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:37:03 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id f13so298650wrm.13 for <40559@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:37:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1axQVtLzM66YehGh17QNWrL3H6lHR2rHjbR4bKgBY5k=; b=qrEhMP6kEdlRgtoS3jrNojVYXqmDsoa9nAVD+O/QKxSrsuSSZrP/qVeLGA2JsViHik 5xS209cF4dYVuYj/6cUSfiloS7iZklxzuNjlLpu3HDczY9sj8VD3qSLsM5qVgqWrAAy+ qlz08qi3mj3Fi7aVijI9HAq6LqZVq1uHPkunSA08lRpd5/5AaZUPdXDqCDWfDvFk6xPp k4KG3rcEmfhrgoRJYVkRuFsf+V0ZFqi18eY19zryvR+dBngvWR+1XV7KKw2C5DABMIY1 phzNJENea8UTMTZzKhZeD0RcqwQsbuWakYqpoWNcMc2wNSugAe4f1FJkyIzY25vqYX9u tINg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1axQVtLzM66YehGh17QNWrL3H6lHR2rHjbR4bKgBY5k=; b=qgZBy+8TU5QScia3vRrJkNxcx4/bIsny2sDeQyDi6aO2kevHoTM0rajzQ4eNxPlVkB 54fYa0vzjfmDVzK5obAmXEw5b0Jl3xflY4TP0gbtrtSEc03cgERrpgvAV3yB6MN8JN0z st/0ey/IlFPaCv+hhxQ2NAkrLFc/y+V6KRNSI2TPVJKpjACkHJ/CckjSbsuNrsBCnRMN 3B8k/c7qoDE8jIXZEA6QP1+cOb85uuAftRN9+dqp+QsKMHaKYUj3xibUEL49016W982F H+Xb3z8OlC+tjaQHOzK55vO+l8DfNv6Vh1bzvFqsXtKzYQprfCJ14vy634uLiQCCITsW vczQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuascI/NvdKdnbjYwdQqXgpIBW6IeQMVwYLxhiLXpjGBi419KoTC taSCDhDoZkfxLxNIkNoSud04Yak9 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKEysgI48zQK+vLmtOut9btRxhu7SK6TmWZGcPBbA6an/mrar/pkeLOgqBrsgaAusifkWRDJQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:de8b:: with SMTP id w11mr266297wrl.48.1587073016905; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (se167-1-82-242-148-1.fbx.proxad.net. [82.242.148.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n11sm30960712wrg.72.2020.04.16.14.36.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [bug#40559] [PATCH] gnu: cryptsetup: Update to 2.3.1. To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= References: <87blnrh03t.fsf@gnu.org> From: Vincent Legoll Message-ID: <684a5fa5-5aef-3bf8-aced-6cfeb0a7c97d@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:36:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87blnrh03t.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 16/04/2020 18:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Vincent Legoll skribis: > >> Untested > > Could you test it with “make check-system TESTS=encrypted-root-os”? > It takes time and disk spac [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ipxe.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (vincent.legoll[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.8 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.68 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.5 PDS_BTC_ID FP reduced Bitcoin ID 2.5 BITCOIN_SPAM_02 BitCoin spam pattern 02 X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40559 Cc: 40559@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 16/04/2020 18:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Vincent Legoll skribis: > >> Untested > > Could you test it with “make check-system TESTS=encrypted-root-os”? > It takes time and disk spac [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ipxe.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.8 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.68 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (vincent.legoll[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.5 PDS_BTC_ID FP reduced Bitcoin ID 2.5 BITCOIN_SPAM_02 BitCoin spam pattern 02 On 16/04/2020 18:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Vincent Legoll skribis: > >> Untested > > Could you test it with “make check-system TESTS=encrypted-root-os”? > It takes time and disk space, but that’s a good way to make sure > cryptsetup is still able to decrypt our LUKS partitions. OK, I'm trying it, but seems stuck. Almost two hours passed since one of the tests has begun, and it looks like it does not make any progress. output is here: --------------------------------8<----------------------------------- SeaBIOS (version rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org) iPXE (http://ipxe.org) 00:03.0 CA00 PCI2.10 PnP PMM+0FF90830+0FEF0830 CA00 Booting from Hard Disk... GRUB loading.. Welcome to GRUB! Attempting to decrypt master key... Enter passphrase for hd0,gpt2 (12345678123412341234123456789abc): Slot 0 opened --------------------------------8<----------------------------------- guixbui+ 14560 0.7 1.6 682316 275948 ? Sl 21:47 0:45 \_ /gnu/store/pzqfxg3kihc6zqdg581ww7mgnwhbh7bh-qemu-minimal-4.2.0/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -no-reboot -m 256 -drive file=disk.img,if=virtio -nographic -monitor unix:/tmp/monitor -chardev socket,id=repl,path=/tmp/repl -device virtio-serial -device virtserialport,chardev=repl,name=org.gnu.guix.port.0 started at 21:47, it's now 23:30 It's running in a VM with lots of ram & cores, virtual disk on a nvme, my patch rebased on guix/master at: 90ec7085793700552359d9d409287528437f0280 Anything more I can do ? -- Vincent Legoll