From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 22 16:52:45 2020 Received: (at 40164) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2020 20:52:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51016 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jG7aP-0005ba-CD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 16:52:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53782) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jG7aM-0005bI-Oc for 40164@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 16:52:43 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40186) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jG7aH-0000UA-9X for 40164@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 16:52:37 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=38636 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jG7aG-0003us-K5 for 40164@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 16:52:37 -0400 Resent-To: 40164@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 21:52:35 +0100 Resent-Message-ID: <87r1xkt8mk.fsf@gnu.org> Received: from solo.fdn.fr ([unix socket]) by solo (Cyrus 2.5.10-Debian-2.5.10-3.2) with LMTPA; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 23:56:29 +0100 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.4 Received: by solo.fdn.fr (Postfix) id D7CC7D1751; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 23:56:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by solo.fdn.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1AF7D174F for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 23:56:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFn2a-0006WC-6N for ludovic.courtes@fdn.fr; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 18:56:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54325) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jFn2Z-00039X-1Z for ludo@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 18:56:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFn2Y-0006VW-1A for ludo@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 18:56:26 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from mail-40130.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.130]:63779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFn2X-0006V3-IV for ludo@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 18:56:25 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 22:56:18 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=default; t=1584831383; bh=5Ej3bKbNDKJXU1BqLWgNz7vzIqBzYc/lTuSXN1RJIWY=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pK+4dgkg8918XYewoTGhVitY00zkbWzI+ITus4EP6buzbP+FiKK5rJOircYzCSyN5 2aezsQBKDnoVEyi7zOrTZXS4U1XsXXn+GXjE8oDiUcQRGhGVNb9Ldz5ODWcl5t76xz Ak5DBYeMsJar3p+JqrUN5+Mo8Au2Qla0loObb8lM= To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= From: Formbi Subject: Re: [bug#40164] Fix for libgccjit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87k13dwd96.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k13dwd96.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.70.40.130 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I think this has no effect because this ‘native-search-paths’ is already > inherited from ‘gcc-9’, which ‘libgccjit’ inherits from. Nope, it does have an effect. I added "lib/gcc" to the original paths (and that was the needed thing). Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.51.188.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: protonmail.com] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 2.5 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40164 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Formbi Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) > I think this has no effect because this =E2=80=98native-search-paths= =E2=80=99 is already > inherited from =E2=80=98gcc-9=E2=80=99, which =E2=80=98libgccjit=E2=80= =99 inherits from. Nope, it does have an effect. I added "lib/gcc" to the original paths (and = that was the needed thing).