From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 08 17:54:17 2020 Received: (at 38940) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2020 22:54:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51458 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ipKDR-0004V6-Lk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 17:54:17 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f178.google.com ([209.85.167.178]:39869) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ipKDQ-0004Ur-BV for 38940@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 17:54:16 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f178.google.com with SMTP id a67so4221617oib.6 for <38940@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 14:54:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a0ossGlviZpvJOrURX0/U+013hNstvNjo81JynOv8/w=; b=USDhbudprWzr8/8XFAS3tjSQRhn2efLUzF8BU5P0J/dZFnleWLw4evrQG4cr2F2RYS KPfRJamQz75Z//41CzKSZ93AtQ7lvpGiWTrVhjiKXcFoinzo47VPLaycoLYKP0LMhw06 C9W6L8hR0AdMrEVQ/NWfz2L7g7Vf5PyTfOZrgeHKbrUFHY4h9c3Mq5Aq0oIlgq1YpNNj KnVnEHlwYqYwA7ynsAVrCo+huyqCH5Mrbs+GVdd5oHaEsPDAjcdLe8PagqbXePNu8Qds Bd0ajDVrJHL2KEd4fkRRcnqLvuzgV17HhlURAY7OtfJUAT5Fkn0+VZwn9DgW+6oUOfYC Gxog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a0ossGlviZpvJOrURX0/U+013hNstvNjo81JynOv8/w=; b=Z7jQH0rvci3mgSfwNefNeqRGHv6UTX96FqZFTudhwdrxRfREGgIVpdmMFyG15ZWyoW k9d6/nwl3a7lN6KnqePP5PPcjeaV5TWs9h/1XdzgfS7lnGBB4mwAofC36ckOdhK9hvsJ z+yvo1UUSlku92FGXy5KnNY+CUOF+PhEsdOiKZAh1mR6fic7Q+st0q4vdxoqLyED8o+M Ieunf1r3Bff7KuZzf2EUXFC30XDNIy2A9hii0elIL7vuBuxd8J2QhljScj/AgMHDJM1w Tkei4cg+TSc6dUW+NXhcA6Q1e+FkIpJUMbqTxwGq367vrAYosR+XCSi4DOc0/Am3+++J k1Kw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVimuFvmYhTI0Sf/WDxEigjPeLW4lX+yeHy9/NtIUmyPETJwicR tmKTM4ewnPHi7C5S6ZVlaSI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzvqXtMz1Lp65STLwxI35fSUclwI/8p0nxXP+uX/5GfvGrZy2ieP+dWCAeDqEF2bkGC0AZxVg== X-Received: by 2002:aca:c493:: with SMTP id u141mr813003oif.62.1578524050633; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 14:54:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2602:304:ce41:f650:bd29:4137:2651:5d5b? ([2602:304:ce41:f650:bd29:4137:2651:5d5b]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h1sm1638991otn.6.2020.01.08.14.54.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Jan 2020 14:54:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1578524047.4836.21.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: bug#38940: \x1b]8; ; OSC character displayed on hyperlinks shown after calls to `guix describe` or `guix show` on mate-terminal 1.12.1 (Trisquel 8) From: Calvin Heim To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 14:54:07 -0800 In-Reply-To: <877e21eiy9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1578206891.2605.33.camel@gmail.com> <1578342380.2215.13.camel@gmail.com> <1578475589.2665.55.camel@gmail.com> <877e21eiy9.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38940 Cc: 38940@debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 22:28 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Calvin Heim skribis: > > > > > On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 12:58 +0100, zimoun wrote: > > > > > > Does the environment variable NO_OSC appears to you more meaningful > > > than INSIDE_EMACS? > > It is more meaningful, but this terminal does interpret other operating system codes, > > like OSC 12 for changing the cursor color. NO_OSC_8 would be specific to hyperlinks. > The theory is that terminals should ignore OSC codes that they do not > support.  Good’ol xterm, for instance, silently ignores those hyperlink > codes, whereas GNOME Terminal interprets them nicely. > I concur. > So I would say that this is a bug in this version of mate-terminal, or > perhaps in the libvte version it’s using? Yes, the bug is in libvte 0.28.2 as distributed with Trisquel 8's software updater.  I misspoke earlier when I mentioned mate-terminal. This bug will be resolved eventually by Trisquel following the upstream sources in  Ubuntu, so barring objections I will close this issue. > I’ve just tried mate-terminal 1.22.0 on vte 0.58.3 from Guix, and it > silently ignores those codes. > > Thanks, > Ludo’. Thanks, Calvin