From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 04 12:34:05 2019 Received: (at 38478) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2019 17:34:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42646 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1icYXI-0004f9-2J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 12:34:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50228) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1icYXA-0004eq-IW for 38478@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 12:33:58 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icYX4-0001Is-6H; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 12:33:46 -0500 Received: from [160.174.176.236] (port=48220 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1icYX3-0004V6-IS; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 12:33:46 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) Subject: Re: [bug#38478] [PATCH 4/4] machine: ssh: can include the host key. References: <20191203211557.21145-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20191203211557.21145-4-ludo@gnu.org> <87d0d4qlc0.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 18:33:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87d0d4qlc0.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> (Jakob L. Kreuze's message of "Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:19:59 -0500") Message-ID: <87tv6gatc9.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38478 Cc: 38478@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi! zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: > I've only been able to follow the updates to "guix deploy" somewhat > tangentially, but I was very excited to see this patch in my inbox. > Thumbs up from me, thanks Ludo! Heheh, thank you! I went ahead and pushed it as it seemed like a good idea to not wait. BTW, I=E2=80=99m wondering if we should go further and deprecate missing/#f =E2=80=98host-key=E2=80=99 fields altogether. WDYT? To me it just seems wiser to have that info within the deploy config rather than out-of-band in ~/.ssh/known_hosts. Ludo=E2=80=99.