From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 30 02:45:20 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2019 07:45:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33757 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iaxRQ-0005gg-A5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 02:45:20 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50773) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iaxRN-0005gY-Ka for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 02:45:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iaxRM-0006bH-Et for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 02:45:17 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iaxRL-0003Rs-E0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 02:45:16 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu ([2a00:5884:8208::1]:38204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iaxRL-0003Q3-5V for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 02:45:15 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 303c8bc7; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 07:45:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; s= dkim; bh=Vfjq8y+cSLBlIRi9YLMT2wE0JgQ=; b=e0xrSQThYArSiWEaX0EWD5X kuXJjIaqHpLZTRnzb9nA1jtFv4W6F3P37vqemQzQayPYTJWYXj+AnXkTc/hAaQQR CNWt5J5D4SFCCvhm6ZySpCbri34FW4fz+2jUZnQf5N4ZiwlnUYVTqTTH8bqHLLS9 +g7Lnc6SUhfEgtd7wPCXMW3ErpPoORRYuFiMT1v24z8cOa8sdw2BsqwaXrN0YOAu seLwFJsV6Xmad1PM1kNRaCptV7w7ICU+LKJzLIDgMMS51Y/u/rd3Bo9mBUOzcUsQ qK8otTvu1mbnQsY7n7nXD4dec1QV6YwmXw9za/O9UXJRv67IMZn0XO/BKBlHHmw= = Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1be59d91 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 30 Nov 2019 07:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 08:45:09 +0100 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <871rtq57kd.fsf@netris.org> References: <20191129075938.GA55971@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> <878sny6fgr.fsf@netris.org> <20191129150329.GA80736@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> <871rtq57kd.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: bug#38422: .png files in /gnu/store with executable permissions (555) To: bug-guix@gnu.org, Mark H Weaver , Bengt Richter From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:5884:8208::1 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 38422@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Le 30 novembre 2019 05:08:55 GMT+01:00, Mark H Weaver a = =C3=A9crit : >Hi Bengt, > >Bengt Richter writes: > >> On +2019-11-29 07:20:41 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: >>> The proper solution is to send bug reports to the upstream >developers of >>> docbook-xsl, faba-icon-theme, and moka-icon-theme, asking them to >fix >>> the permissions of the *=2Epng files in their source tarballs=2E >>> >> That I haven't done=2E Is there a standard way to do it? > >No=2E > >> "guix show moka-icon-theme" tells me homepage, but it would be nice >> to have a guix show --verbose that would show bug reporting info :) > >It would be nice, but it would also be an enormous amount of work=2E >First we'd need to devise a way to represent that information, and then >we'd need to add it to each of our 10K+ packages=2E It would also be an >additional job to do when adding new packages=2E I'm not sure it's worth >all that work=2E We already record the home page, and from there it's >usually not much work to find how to report bugs=2E In cases where it >_is_ difficult to find out how to report bugs, that's arguably a >problem >that should be fixed upstream=2E > >What do you think? > > Regards, > Mark Also, we should not encourage people to report bugs upstream directly=2E W= e have to evaluate whether the bug is on our side or theirs first to not dr= own them in useless bug reports :)