From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 21 09:24:19 2020 Received: (at 37939) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2020 14:24:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46574 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j59E2-0001az-SL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:24:19 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f169.google.com ([209.85.222.169]:36483) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j59E1-0001am-AN for 37939@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:24:17 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f169.google.com with SMTP id t83so1950538qke.3 for <37939@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:24:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=udRSBM9qZ/EsKVVx5lCf0NvZBxzbpshqXmZQZ/j63/8=; b=Ah4f6yG8IfOiuf1YY43NsxVR0vX+FL03T2XnSHqDn9MDTGvzldhJ4dYxvnnDNYQMJE ZXgmxe6cWCbh70g6+NSMCGkgkbVvBKIQ1WfbeQNlNOHirfyK9wS1HTczVPrpwD/SWPO7 LXgFhQPocW1Rajg1ZIe0bvpMUiREIRCn1KQe/8R1XnJRnl0X7PFq2pMfqLuO+wEQDhox 2EtGc0RDdIrMY4lwlxX4kTyOGsgPNrcxaZkoxo3eZnCPJ6wfGKS7+1Q7EnHRyeRP2Atv +Cj+G1T8JgIpkEgmgaMJwDpO0/1dEmcmxUKbcp0dlRazTwkMY6YZIKlJPf1XY5dm6Ew8 xuxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=udRSBM9qZ/EsKVVx5lCf0NvZBxzbpshqXmZQZ/j63/8=; b=cyZbTfnbY76/rnQ9M6V1zaWhe0ud0XPVpMqjt1GBC6X4dBkeAqwKFWwiD9z1rQm/R4 l45k7W7qGBhH4zhVQfe27l1F6ilYG+PtfXX76B+87YLiTRvzfAijZK87+TSofhSnQBDF x38eUx4/3L/0sEssvkEM4g9pMFsao23Urw1+6E+O6zce/sahVm2s7s5FXc8sqCfCH1bW 7kI0Dl/346HwAupX0IJMSRf6yMtFlp7jRckhzeZUlD3EZ0Fs12A2whPSePcC71fHT6YI OISJOuGg3LuloCwFpJUwE0CL0os2bvhVbpMeRpoLtAXGzHnaGHayLvxNq6amMoZsgRCR FBfg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWdQjlT8rPL+z84gWIRIRzPyzWafRFXYDAk27W6flN4igpoJuuP Brd7a3TBTLEAjBirEDwI0tYajTxgwHVdo0CUce4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwaCDaCAMnfG28JmkE9P0yfxnRUgeiBK8k4GLKyWUkORdkshr7z4zPpbsmhg+Vxe7iaysHTizn/a4OAQ2IdtkE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:124f:: with SMTP id a15mr30577125qkl.201.1582295051840; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:24:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191027095752.2b4d8975.kmx@posteo.net> <20191027121517.GB2716@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> <20191113122512.53ff5d9c.kmx@posteo.net> In-Reply-To: From: zimoun Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:24:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#37939: guix-install.sh: Fails to detect signing key on Debian10. To: Kai Mertens Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37939 Cc: 37939@debbugs.gnu.org, Bengt Richter X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dear > On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 03:34, Kai Mertens wrote: > > Anyway =E2=80=93 it is of course not a bug of the guix script. Maybe a = usage > > hint within the guix documentation in section 2.1 would be nice? I think it is not a bug and I do not see what could be improved. I would like to close this bug. Is it ok for you? Or do you have a comment to add? Thank you in advance. All the best, simon