From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 01 05:11:54 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2019 09:11:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47678 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhsLp-0004S3-V5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:11:54 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40280) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhsLn-0004Rt-NL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:11:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhsLm-0005eK-OB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:11:51 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhsLl-00087p-MW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:11:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:39732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhsLl-00086H-CA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:11:49 -0400 Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 858491B93EC for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 02:11:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1561972308; bh=9wFLrQPOWz7jt2AWd9KVH61UdMsO0jKPsNl5+o9+gTI=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=qxhitcsRtYUAi07DefOyFRjvV6zEykoVhyPZg4vcxXEtM4WgifgwKXQ9xd2BGaRJ8 HBRdtbEEmq5/GSDJrLjOTSoHR32jpgb8O6hQN9emaDSnbROAg+f2BoQrnPufZ4Y1Jk dN5axxoprT4w9CkKoFp7PgAYPOkfCWTYB8c57Vkk= X-Riseup-User-ID: F3D144FA0D3F94842BA0E4B9C74377BEFCFFE1AF23D51531302F116CA93C6046 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 026F02233AF for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 02:11:47 -0700 (PDT) To: Report new Guix bug From: swedebugia Subject: Guix does not match point-versions correctly Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 11:11:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 198.252.153.129 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hi I'm doing the crate-adventure and stumbled on this: starting phase `build' error: failed to select a version for the requirement `clippy = "^0.0.41"` candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.0.302 location searched: directory source `/tmp/guix-build-rust-blake2-rfc-0.2.18.drv-0/blake2-rfc-0.2.18/guix-vendor` (which is replacing registry `https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index`) required by package `blake2-rfc v0.2.18 (/tmp/guix-build-rust-blake2-rfc-0.2.18.drv-0/blake2-rfc-0.2.18)` But the version we got is way above .41. 0.0.302 > 0.0.41! WDYT? -- Cheers Swedebugia