From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 19 11:48:12 2019 Received: (at 34573) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2019 16:48:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55474 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw8Yz-0004LI-Q4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:48:10 -0500 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:12863) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw8Yy-0004Kr-1p for 34573@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:48:08 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,388,1544482800"; d="scan'208";a="370061395" Received: from zcs-store5.inria.fr ([128.93.142.32]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2019 17:48:01 +0100 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:48:01 +0100 (CET) From: Vincent Rouvreau To: Andreas Enge , Ricardo Wurmus Message-ID: <1957885728.7840402.1550594881373.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <20190219154202.GA5022@jurong> References: <703275152.7669150.1550570158536.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> <20190219154202.GA5022@jurong> Subject: Re: bug#34573: Backtrace of guix pull failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [193.55.177.134] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.7.11_GA_3706 (ZimbraWebClient - FF65 (Linux)/8.7.11_GA_3706) Thread-Topic: bug#34573: Backtrace of guix pull failed Thread-Index: /APxDRctFxwl9y23jfDalp1okQMKCA== X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34573 Cc: 34573@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Hello, I rolled back all my generations (I hope this is good - with command guix p= ackage --roll-back) $ guix package -i python python-numpy python-conda Les paquets suivants seront install=E9s : python=093.7.0=09/gnu/store/9z98cvjm7p7z21xdid1ryydxy5vyz6wr-python-3.7.= 0 python-numpy=091.15.4=09/gnu/store/hsdzxq5jvb96yffnxqp8h4lq5z59r29k-pyth= on-numpy-1.15.4 python-conda=094.3.16=09/gnu/store/gabw5n3216xzbbsjsc5j5vhjpninanyh-pyth= on-conda-4.3.16 $ eval `guix package --search-paths=3Dprefix` It seems there is no issue. nscd seems to be launched. I am not admin on the server. $ ps aux | grep nscd vrou001 25642 0.0 0.0 112688 976 pts/37 S+ 17:46 0:00 grep --co= lor=3Dauto nscd nscd 135028 0.0 0.0 768500 4020 ? Ssl f=E9vr.11 2:17 /usr/= sbin/nscd Maybe this is not a guix bug but a server issue. Sorry for the noise, I will see with the admin. Regards, Vincent Rouvreau ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Andreas Enge" > =C0: "vincent rouvreau" > Cc: 34573@debbugs.gnu.org > Envoy=E9: Mardi 19 F=E9vrier 2019 16:42:02 > Objet: Re: bug#34573: Backtrace of guix pull failed > Bonjour Vincent, >=20 > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:55:58AM +0100, Vincent Rouvreau wrote: >> And guix pull failed : >>=20 >> guix package -i python python-numpy python-conda >> eval `guix package --search-paths=3Dprefix` >=20 > so the first two commands succeeded? >=20 >> guix pull >> Backtrace: >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 2887:24 19 (_) >> 222:29 18 (map1 (((guix i18n)) ((guix gexp)) ((guix sets)) ((?)) ?)) >> 222:29 17 (map1 (((guix gexp)) ((guix sets)) ((guix utils)) (#) ?)) >> 222:29 16 (map1 (((guix sets)) ((guix utils)) ((guix store)) (#) ?)) >> 222:29 15 (map1 (((guix utils)) ((guix store)) ((guix config)) # ?)) >> 222:29 14 (map1 (((guix store)) ((guix config)) ((guix #)) ((?)) ?)) >> 222:29 13 (map1 (((guix config)) ((guix packages)) ((guix #)) # ?)) >> 222:29 12 (map1 (((guix packages)) ((guix profiles)) ((guix #)) ?)) >> 222:17 11 (map1 (((guix profiles)) ((guix derivations)) ((# #)) ?)) >> 2800:17 10 (resolve-interface (guix profiles) #:select _ #:hide _ # ?) >> In ice-9/threads.scm: >> 390:8 9 (_ _) >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 2726:13 8 (_) >=20 > Could you post the lines preceding this error message? I just experienced > a similar case, and the real error happened before (a package needed to b= e > compiled first and failed). >=20 > Could you please send the output of > guix --version > and > guix describe > ? >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Andreas