From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 15 06:21:45 2019 Received: (at 33899) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jul 2019 10:21:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46475 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmy77-0007wX-73 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 06:21:45 -0400 Received: from mail1.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.18]:12764) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmy75-0007wK-5z for 33899@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 06:21:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:21:29 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hector.link; s=protonmail; t=1563186095; bh=TIpP7wYPxWbYeJf5L4gugk8l4GYnpT0V2wx9rOANvpI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From; b=VEvbU3Qm58WF1lDTfG0xttvMUI9OablWV5XHdKmjJHdM60QI3QvhddQnFsRpJ4NjS p8YrCBQ1lQyzk2+ZLpTcTOYTjhtTeiJsrpz3rbfEaHtEqhDTnDj4fNG19o8IEQ00Tk FU/PCbgrxWj05F/ACgUsy5YEpep0LH9Oh+Pjr6Ig= To: Pierre Neidhardt From: Hector Sanjuan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Distributing substitutes over IPFS Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87zhlf7glw.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <20181228231205.8068-1-ludo@gnu.org> <8736pqthqm.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhlxe8t9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87ftnbf1rt.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef2rr6om.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhlf7glw.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Feedback-ID: omu4N36cG9Zn6VL5xT9it_nicCrTOu6Y4hug0yDo4Tl9cKTzl2pTjvygerP9BSgqCuiI9HYyV2c14cyriTJmCg==:Ext:ProtonMail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33899 Cc: Antoine Eiche , =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= , "go-ipfs-wg\\@ipfs.io" , "33899\\@debbugs.gnu.org" <33899@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Hector Sanjuan Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Monday, July 15, 2019 12:10 PM, Pierre Neidhardt wro= te: > H=C3=A9ctor mentioned a possible issue with the IPLD manifest growing too= big > (in case of too many files in a package), that is, above 2MB. > Then we would need to implement some form of sharding. > > H=C3=A9ctor, do you confirm? Any idea on how to tackle this elegantly? > Doing the DAG node the way I proposed it (referencing a single root) should= be ok... Unless you put too many executable files in that list, it should larg= ely stay within the 2MB limit. -- Hector