From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 01 03:13:24 2021 Received: (at 33848) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2021 07:13:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55996 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRrW8-0006Km-Gu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 03:13:24 -0400 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:49897) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRrW7-0006KY-3J for 33848@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 03:13:23 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 92.169.147.163 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1335-163.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.147.163]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D275E1C000E; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 07:13:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Mark H Weaver , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: Re: bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible" In-Reply-To: <87czvebky2.fsf@netris.org> References: <87r2e8jpfx.fsf@gnu.org> <877eg0i43j.fsf@netris.org> <87d0psi1xo.fsf@gnu.org> <874lb3kin6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87sgynezha.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvj2yesd.fsf@netris.org> <877efwe04u.fsf@gnu.org> <8736qji7c1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tvizvzgk.fsf@netris.org> <87o9979gfn.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvizgghs.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k1juaomo.fsf@gnu.org> <87muoqhk62.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zhsq8wkj.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0pmhbgn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87r2e28tkv.fsf@gnu.org> <874laygkiy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lfa5eymf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tuoscsk9.fsf@gnu.org> <87im57b8u7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87czvebky2.fsf@netris.org> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 09:13:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87sg4aa35g.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thank you for the reminder, Mark, I had forgotten about your suggestion. If we are going for a SBCL-specific solution, I believe that all references are stored in plain text files at some points (the .asd files and the .lisp files) which are often encoded in ASCII / UTF-8, [...] Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.197 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.183.197 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33848 Cc: 33848@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thank you for the reminder, Mark, I had forgotten about your suggestion. If we are going for a SBCL-specific solution, I believe that all references are stored in plain text files at some points (the .asd files and the .lisp files) which are often encoded in ASCII / UTF-8, [...] Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.197 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.183.197 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Thank you for the reminder, Mark, I had forgotten about your suggestion. If we are going for a SBCL-specific solution, I believe that all references are stored in plain text files at some points (the .asd files and the .lisp files) which are often encoded in ASCII / UTF-8, so searching these files without having to deal with their encoding might be enough. But of course this is less general and more brittle. Mark, Guillaume, would you have time to give this a try? I'm a bit busy at the moment. Let me know if you can't work on it, I'll try to find time to work on a patch. Cheers! -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAmBlcosSHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/ieQIAJVk4okboi89JzT/9KpPbx+HNgf3ks7v FfVyWnUCJeq5NBDKVGWmM9LZ230/rXPU63n7y7ZTYiauSL0UTap3tXtygWfgtDM8 zHWS4uc5KBybz3RoNNH6rMiPp5bGLbs15Y1NatjltpUFEiQp/EOw15my3ZjVxpcY FaUDwQSDaBRmemExSqT03E4vo7qrI7tLNfAmcW3iE3UKDECgs93WmcliUf0nuQL2 YmFHefgOdSScdNOZBO80yIyDmrkWe7C51c22y4pHu86sNLaJ3mVA1N+kNAtjG/qv pUw9E34Q1mSZY/1jbraa9f0J11PR6eJNU43dQdmOUeA/QdqBDCoOXb4= =uiP6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--