From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 26 06:57:29 2020 Received: (at 33844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2020 11:57:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56534 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6vJg-0004wW-Rq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:57:29 -0500 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21105) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6vJf-0004wN-Cr for 33844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:57:28 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582718235; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=R3abn+zAcZ4MXGlTQAzr3hvuCyg/LwwtULNP4JqaKmgibWNbbSFLWrScpGF6t3IbVlXQjvvb9ve3f0oM0XQVD34MCjcyHEaDr56mQDzO4qcBheTOzY3i3wU7L/Ysnuu9EX9wshIZdZkn9S9H83l3SnNdZm6ZKuv6edxzUoATXIg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1582718235; h=Content-Type:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=RyzH2nlm5mzs4KryEgvnePpKo6yP3TmLfhavzqs98Gk=; b=M74e6WPOsPbY0f3RlRgzpiNyKHXHw2XfJMSQGAfvIQ5SosguG1/pREyQ0BnLlEN94XlUdSz5/cGbGRn7SSgaNviqNvSftO+n9KqGv7QUrtwHv4snJVGvBGNhjY5TR4005xFO+i+5wzPftZyJ3ZWH65My3qIXgaWudi5o2Ljot0g= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1582718235; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=RyzH2nlm5mzs4KryEgvnePpKo6yP3TmLfhavzqs98Gk=; b=EwbVlgghxySBs0j7EGZ2PDBAmpZVuNOJIHM0+B26ieRbszzcgxvX/Too1WjbJHgC 0rfD3Bjp+OyUtrWRJjPOe717nPcp3MeoY8iYL9Q3KKaFq4wG3Hv7pZA6XtpIzQP+fkJ kDLwnWAGew53Y9wc4cTNnvz/c3LpOtX8iWEk5UXU= Received: from localhost (p4FD5AEC7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.213.174.199]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1582718225723343.1582048843436; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:57:05 -0800 (PST) References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc In-reply-to: <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:57:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87wo89imsx.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pierre Neidhardt writes: > swedebugia@riseup.net writes: > >> Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. > > I agree. What do other people think? I agree. Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: riseup.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [136.143.188.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.8 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844 Cc: swedebugia@riseup.net, 33844@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) Pierre Neidhardt writes: > swedebugia@riseup.net writes: > >> Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. > > I agree. What do other people think? I agree. We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. -- Ricardo