From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 26 05:44:53 2018 Received: (at 33106) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Oct 2018 09:44:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43192 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gFyfl-0003Dj-78 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 05:44:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42707) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gFyfk-0003DW-GY for 33106@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 05:44:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFyfb-0000rM-Gf for 33106@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 05:44:47 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFyfb-0000rE-B9; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 05:44:43 -0400 Received: from dhcp-64-177.ens-lyon.fr ([140.77.64.177]:58070 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gFyfb-0001qc-0r; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 05:44:43 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Chris Marusich Subject: Re: bug#33106: "make check-system TESTS=basic" fails on master References: <87k1mcqvt5.fsf@gmail.com> <87pnw2jfc5.fsf@gnu.org> <87lg6pujj8.fsf@garuda.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <871s8gp10g.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1m75ypf.fsf@gnu.org> <875zxppa1a.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 5 Brumaire an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:44:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <875zxppa1a.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:11:13 -0700") Message-ID: <87lg6lnit2.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33106 Cc: 33106@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Chris Marusich skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Hmm, super weird. Does the machine support KVM properly? Any hints in >> =E2=80=98dmesg=E2=80=99 or /var/log/messages? Is this GuixSD running on= the bare metal? > > I haven't seen any KVM-related problems in the past. I checked dmesg, > messages, and a couple other log files for obvious problems, but I > couldn't find any. This GuixSD is running on bare metal (a Lenovo X200 > with Libreboot, to be precise). Did it work before on this machine? I have a vague recollection that there were KVM issues on the X200. This is x86_64? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.