From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 11 04:57:54 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2018 09:57:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37626 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ekoOQ-00072J-LC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 04:57:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54368) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ekoOP-000728-UY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 04:57:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekoOD-0003ap-Ry for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 04:57:48 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:35591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekoNp-0003Ph-N8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 04:57:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekoNo-00080n-Ff for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 04:57:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekoNl-0003MC-7U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 04:57:16 -0500 Received: from mail.thebird.nl ([95.154.246.10]:59637) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekoNl-0003LR-0x; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 04:57:13 -0500 Received: by mail.thebird.nl (Postfix, from userid 502) id 7CDD11248D7; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 10:53:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 10:53:32 +0100 From: Pjotr Prins To: Chris Marusich Subject: Re: ARM compilation via qemu binfmt - Assertion failure Message-ID: <20180211095332.GA18764@thebird.nl> References: <87bmh4qrf5.fsf@abyayala.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87bmh3kbd9.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1vqv23v.fsf@abyayala.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20180208174238.2abc85dc@scratchpost.org> <87fu68o1dd.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fu68o1dd.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Danny Milosavljevic , bug-guix@gnu.org, ng0@n0.is X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 12:45:18AM +0100, Chris Marusich wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic writes: > > > This is only fixed in glibc 2.27 (not in core-updates). > > Should we upgrade glibc in core-updates, then? Or is it better to do it > in the next core-updates cycle, to avoid still more unexpected breakage? I think we should not update packages deep in the tree unless there is a security patch. What we have now is well tested. Pj. --