From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 30 12:28:03 2018 Received: (at 30250) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2018 17:28:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49803 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egZhT-00079Y-BY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:28:03 -0500 Received: from bs-one.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:51952 helo=disroot.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egZhR-00079F-Rz for 30250@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:28:02 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADBA21393; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 18:28:00 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1517333280; bh=QBzZuEGGSnEkAV5DM4Wj1t+FVARWbFO0+uFJQEXrxSQ=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=ZZLMlj/nuLQdPataWyGgsbzlWBBBJB8ND9tLbjpLXVVtqaV6PnAD+y4EW7cTRK2Y8 yKeL4jZZFNE7ptBymnMBhIIIYT0KwoH9vijU7KMoUO2hrsGzeMqlLv1QDEnyPExW0Z DRilz2FBTi8k4xtOM8Opy8SPqTzgnMGGMewjZGtg= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail01.disroot.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TFWZuNrFXV2f; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 18:27:59 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1517333279; bh=QBzZuEGGSnEkAV5DM4Wj1t+FVARWbFO0+uFJQEXrxSQ=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=IwV18UDjt58RMvr6Py95m0jkh5DoQ+v8zYTahXiO3b8jk/XBwmiKVRurXI+DKhzIR 8CywFcwFtoISRVyEpqLBnFXXU8ZDA9eD2txDDEvtbe34+CUg1L0vochce2QqZ6Uion FPj3q2XK8qiB1lNicn6bv+n6LFpJnQ1acxUpR9ko= Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:27:58 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Jorge" Message-ID: Subject: =?utf-8?B?UmU6IGJ1ZyMzMDI1MDogVHdvIGZhaWx1cmVzIG9uIOKAmG0=?= =?utf-8?B?YWtlIC1rICItaiQobnByb2MpIiBjaGVja+KAmQ==?= To: ludo@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87o9lbxo6u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o9lbxo6u.fsf@gnu.org> <87d11v2tgj.fsf@gnu.org> <962f08d068b8c20e269f289a501cf07b@disroot.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30250 Cc: 30250@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) January 30, 2018 3:16 PM, ludo@gnu.org wrote:=0A=0A> This has to do with = bad $http_proxy handling in old Guile versions=0ABut I am using the packa= ged Guile from Debian buster, which is recent:=0A $ guile --version=0A= guile (GNU Guile) 2.2.2=0A Packaged by Debian (2.2.2-deb+2-1)=0A = [=E2=80=A6]=0A=0A> [=E2=80=A6] that download step no longer exists in t= he =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99=0A> branch that=E2=80=99s to be merged = in the coming days.=0AThank you for the information. Perhaps I should tr= y again after that=0Abranch is merged.=0A=0A> Thanks anyway, I consider t= he case closed on our side.=0A=0AWill you update the test so it works whe= n =E2=80=98language/tree-il/spec.scm=E2=80=99 is=0Aa symlink? Since Stow= is a GNU package, maybe Guix should either be=0Acompatible with it or wa= rn in the documentation about the=0Aincompatibility.=0A=0ARegards