From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 08 20:09:55 2021 Received: (at 26489) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2021 01:09:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52193 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9HXP-0007p0-8S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 20:09:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com ([209.85.221.42]:45574) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9HXO-0007oT-11 for 26489@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 20:09:54 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id m13so19540083wro.12 for <26489@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:09:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NfewAS2iYuKAjnjf30fSCduoFiz1YyVWVPjbI0UDVKc=; b=rqu3Q0YfwYXxYTYPNecyvNziy9GBe/Pl3DF7IdkOnQX3KF0a76ux4p7ObTYUojro+k 1vAGmG+bZc/42awjZGgKRI4lOIPpqNZ63+5KRAmXZQ1VpYZaM/b1n4XjHYIPqLu/cMCj WyDVdM6z/R7op5zaTVHSLGUiRrOKQMii9jbCf97ENri4HSuKiAV2ck87Ex3vxcqRURmz HLRgy8tQJs0gZ9/lgDiG2Pj8+h1+Q6R0tAGCyJrk9YX22Xll5GWrpSDG0BGUHT2leSW8 w+v4Un8455fxG2HsvRQQtqIg7zwKBb4LrFvMXYvIHQfVQ13dTl/8sYG8fQezBqscfjrW 8dLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NfewAS2iYuKAjnjf30fSCduoFiz1YyVWVPjbI0UDVKc=; b=AwimS36P73K6uGV2w/7wX5TiNQchYtZn4C2rMiUwCqS/30E1JHr5L9A3T52FxltL+e Dmu/q+v6e+JaWdGIzf2+YQn/wd60XHm0SSg/LWEpcNsXDAefgS2L68wRlJ70RoDF6OrQ 1R7SUGepmfdEjeXYEHX8NxTAJM/sii1DP/mKTrhOOlWHtOtv4rUkI123JYSyicDp9Cmq H7+IWabwHghTO3PfX4sEyi+Mt0Mxkr2wVaYTvTjbKrpYT+Jzo9Ov7i/rk30MXtQF3mB8 ZpTK4tklEz9HKgQrBgxRdcAPUSHspQpr9UUgUod+q17EI7UQTrCHsCi/Dg1a5l9zmDzR vaEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531XG+xQdBPUj+ojFGXPAqZxCmcgmkCFWzFqzf6drS9yKdr+MI9u jiYpz/nD8jE2e1TPKhrpntGKvHJAiWY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/zDc6h3SitAHFARFnVkJRv/wUr12e0Jr+ZUxrPoqDOKkrld7KHnOy+nK7KwDB4P/L6Q64pg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4142:: with SMTP id c2mr22883935wrq.359.1612832988585; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:09:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p9sm32224492wrj.11.2021.02.08.17.09.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:09:47 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: Julien Lepiller , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: [bug#26489] [PATCH] substitute: Ignore bad responses. References: <20170414002755.32672-1-me@tobias.gr> <87lgr3gvqf.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9vc3eij.fsf@gnu.org> <861rfmvpdn.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8io8ul7.fsf@gnu.org> <861rertyd5.fsf@gmail.com> <20210115205224.7f775008@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 02:05:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210115205224.7f775008@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> (Julien Lepiller's message of "Fri, 15 Jan 2021 20:52:24 +0100") Message-ID: <86v9b2jbj5.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26489 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 26489@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 20:52, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Le Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:08:22 +0100, > zimoun a =C3=A9crit : >> On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 14:39, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>=20 >> >>> I=E2=80=99d be happy with a patch along these lines!=20=20 >> >> >> >> Tobias, do you plan to rework/rebase it?=20=20 >> > >> > In the meantime, commit 5ff521452b9ec2aae9ed8e4bb7bdc250a581f203 >> > added =E2=80=98bad-response=E2=80=99 handling (and more). We should t= ake a closer >> > look, but it may be that this issue is now addressed.=20=20 >>=20 >> Since you reported the use-case and the patch, could you confirm that >> the commit 5ff521 addresses the issue? >>=20 >> I think it does but maybe I am missing something; probably I am. :-) > > It seems not, since a few days ago we had exactly that problem. See > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/45828 Bug#45828 is now closed. I think it makes sense to close this one too. If no objection, I am proposing to close this old bug. :-) Cheers, simon