From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 30 10:20:55 2017 Received: (at 26300) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2017 14:20:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53019 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctawZ-00046Z-9k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:20:55 -0400 Received: from lb1.openmailbox.org ([5.79.108.160]:57115 helo=mail.openmailbox.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctawW-00046Q-Uj for 26300@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:20:53 -0400 Received: by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 20002) id 383BE50250D; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:20:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1490883652; bh=eigMo9s1I3fMl1iRK4No67lqx/iX8ewmF7wcV+w9Fmk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=D3FYmQOvit8Un94kkEZjTRfjTpvCjVjsZMKQoGhEjucFSD0IMA9/JSBPaz+6YlpZA z8rexVcSKGzYPRA7uvBp0FpAqNgOk4WC4tKwwNKOFSn8PDp4MBmvXVlC2GDjQxK8C/ rOmtMzmSx14P7A6cFp7mDTjny0AkKkRp0j0q2BVs= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on ZDZR002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS, T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 From: Kei Kebreau DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1490883651; bh=eigMo9s1I3fMl1iRK4No67lqx/iX8ewmF7wcV+w9Fmk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=g3Ew6d7W6NW75h4ZG7OcE6ehl3cFrsTUR61YnvSGa+gxaqKI2q+OWuGdjRT5itOvs BiFKvGk3pgkGQi8vTwAWD0iVnEcDka3BqGtlD/KO3e+VOdGGWM49+rwSEuI+APDwUQ tM4ap4YOtbA2jp4efeid0U0yzUNFOIt4kOBpi5Ak= To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#26300: [PATCH] gnu: milkytracker: Update to 1.0.0. References: <20170329145250.3913-1-kei@openmailbox.org> <20170329150419.ytsjr7hndor7qjiv@abyayala> <871stgoyw1.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20170329160821.3hdsx2pdevub6wtg@abyayala> <87y3vonjbj.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87efxe51j2.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:20:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87efxe51j2.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:37:05 +0200") Message-ID: <87vaqqu9qa.fsf@openmailbox.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26300 Cc: ng0 , 26300@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Kei Kebreau writes: > >> ng0 writes: >> >>> Kei Kebreau transcribed 1.3K bytes: >>>> ng0 writes: >>>> >>>> > >>>> > Attribution-Noncommericial=E2=80=A6 doesn't that make them a candida= te for >>>> > exclusion in systems like Guix? >>>> > >>>> >>>> Considering that the songs are data files and non-executable, the >>>> software is still free. If the sample songs turn out to be a problem, I >>>> can attempt to remove them in a snippet. >>> >>> It would help if we could document this. I don't think everyone will re= view >>> upstream material (FSDG and similar) for data files (music, images). >>> I would exclude CC licensed material which says "Noncommercial", but I'm >>> not a lawyer. >> >> It may also cause problems upstream as well. The software is under licen= ses >> with no commerical restrictions and the sample songs are under a >> noncommericial restriction, but they are shared in one tarball. That >> would constitute a conflict, right? > > If my understanding of the FSDG is correct we cannot distribute these > files. The FSDG says this about non-functional data: > > Non-functional Data > > Data that isn't functional, that doesn't do a practical job, is more > of an adornment to the system's software than a part of it. Thus, we > don't insist on the free license criteria for non-functional > data. It can be included in a free system distribution as long as > its license gives you permission to copy and redistribute, both for > commercial and non-commercial purposes. > > In this case the commercial restriction means that we cannot distribute > it. You can remove these files in a snippet. Could you send an updated > patch please? > > -- > Ricardo > > GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC > https://elephly.net A new patch has been sent. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAljdFD0ACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg03FA//fh5ngWv8rPFcB+jh8HgjWrqO8R86g6vlOtS7ysIr9qAC099akU0GVRyW IBseeYgaCIQzlA8bwzvRJbDGpDxRl1S4uQwkI3ixBlBWcl0uuNt0/RxIZqOz2Gmd vYjfXIaKv8+XHd1yq6QX3j5jQgX3iOvrJzRJbuK2QNSB7jhb7JFNYxte7bovUnn7 K+aVBsaq4GfQ30y/mwERQWnebEmoUt4gUfwehMYSPItp7w5xfw/+BMCJPrMzqNPa 6ZznDG9xQgwSxDwhl4WRRHn4wY8+Tb8Xn4JwUesIFr1rZ+rfZzr0Im6haMIPhzY4 tT5Bx78RYDWkbODMM7jNpxlHTAX1MQHlrCHTaoinQa0LxNzK613lOnAOagWEAxdz nsGdU/LT6C+WZXOPSN0WzxrWTy/6GtPflA6WpUloq8z7YVaTfKrXYPknQr+liasL 12Z7nuU6Qx2l7kRTjXBubMDOSOTUcpW+nttxGf0GNO274M7jiRD7tgibxe/qeq9c Jao7f0PEAF3+lIh3bxToXu+2ZoctQZTGsvFieY05rSl1aCy/puHh1F/J7bBw67W9 CPxHS83j81jf9glRKcSpCQIPNBPXfufU0oVfigfR1ii4aAghO+tKyGQwXL/gDj5I sy+GYvwVnL5U52csYy6KNigUO7YmIe3CNxniErx3vpzpIEDTpv8= =qas2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--