From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 10 12:06:46 2017 Received: (at 25928) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2017 16:06:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36924 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8U8U-0005Is-Ef for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 12:06:46 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21046) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8U8S-0005Ik-Js for 25928@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 12:06:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (x2f7f8bb.dyn.telefonica.de [2.247.248.187]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1494432399992563.7523654950161; Wed, 10 May 2017 09:06:39 -0700 (PDT) References: <87zih4ee7i.fsf@gnu.org> <20170313232428.0530762b@alma-ubu> <20170314231326.3ac43a08@alma-ubu> <87fuhu52c8.fsf@elephly.net> <87tw4skdns.fsf@gnu.org> <87k25ohj1j.fsf@elephly.net> <87shkck9ye.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: bug#25928: [PATCH] gnu: Add darktable. In-reply-to: <87shkck9ye.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 18:06:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1bghf1z.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25928 Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_H=C3=B6fling?= , 25928@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) Roel Janssen writes: > > I wonder if it would be possible to augment LDFLAGS and CPATH in > > #:configure-flags or #:make-flags instead of using build phases (which I > > find a bit crude). > > > > If that’s too hard I promise I won’t complain about doing it with build > > phases :) > See attached patch. By adding the LDFLAGS part to either #:make-flags > or #:configure-flags, the run-path validation phase fails at the end of > the build process. > So, maybe we can settle half-way here? :-) Sure, looks good to me! > > Good to push with the change to the description. > > Thanks! > Is this then finally the moment we get to have darktable in Guix? :-) Yay! Thank you! -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net