From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 15 12:01:53 2017 Received: (at 25899-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Mar 2017 16:01:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57383 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1coBN3-0007bh-Iy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:01:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51700) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1coBN2-0007bU-Af for 25899-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:01:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1coBMs-0005qX-Kk for 25899-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:01:46 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57740) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1coBMs-0005qJ-IK; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:01:42 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:59980 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1coBMr-00014A-QN; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:01:42 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#25899: [PATCH] HACKING: Describe guix-patches@gnu.org as the list for patches. References: <20170228115120.7391-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> <87varu1k81.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87wpcab7zn.fsf@elephly.net> <87zigonrd3.fsf@gnu.org> <20170314122440.adh42xmngibqnehl@abyayala> <87pohkw11j.fsf@elephly.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 25 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 225 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:01:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pohkw11j.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:27:52 +0100") Message-ID: <87r31y8r6k.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25899-done Cc: 25899-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Marius Bakke , ng0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > ng0 writes: > >>> Commit 230efa876fea3b38f78502bd759b2943651929de updated the manual to >>> mention guix-patches. Do we need anything more? >> >> Apparently yes, as people still send patches to guix-devel and at the >> time when I wrote this patch were not aware of guix-patches. > > I agree. It would be good to mention =E2=80=9Cguix-patches=E2=80=9D in H= ACKING. To me, > patches that are in =E2=80=9Cguix-patches=E2=80=9D have a much lower risk= to be drowned > out by other discussions. Done in bc551cf32b6ccb3f8dd60b1d0d4e3c3e88cb1f8d! Ludo'.