From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 10 09:54:53 2017 Received: (at 25879-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2017 13:54:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35239 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8S4r-0001qF-O4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 09:54:53 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21097) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8S4p-0001q6-Mf for 25879-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 09:54:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (141.80.148.89 [141.80.148.89]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1494424487779302.7038459122034; Wed, 10 May 2017 06:54:47 -0700 (PDT) References: <87shn12p2i.fsf@gnu.org> <87k28180ob.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1dskjdh.fsf@gnu.org> <8737eosvgb.fsf@gnu.org> <20170307212411.GA29363@mail.thebird.nl> <87bmr1i6l3.fsf@elephly.net> <87inl9gpvu.fsf@gnu.org> <877f1phvox.fsf@elephly.net> <874lwthuxu.fsf@elephly.net> <87wp9okeqt.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: bug#25879: [PATCH] gnu: Add LLVM and CLANG 3.9.1. In-reply-to: <87wp9okeqt.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 15:54:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87wp9ohl5n.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25879-done Cc: 25879-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Pjotr Prins , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) Roel Janssen writes: >>> So, is it OK to push the patch as-is then? >> >> Yes, please! :) > > Pushed in 584da12dc71da745edb13bf748e832b77a0193d7. Great! Closing this bug. >> If you can, it would be good to investigate if current users of 3.8 >> could be built with 3.9, but this doesn’t have to block this patch in my >> opinion. >> >> If in fact all users of 3.8 can be built with 3.9 without problems you >> can make the change in a follow-up commit. > > I am sure that at least 'c-reduce' does not build with 3.9.1. So I > think we'll need to take this on a per-program basis. I'll see which > ones can be built with 3.9.1. Thanks for taking care of this! -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net