From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 14 13:45:17 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2017 18:45:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdi6H-0005Ge-Nn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:45:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38003) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdi6D-0005GO-Id for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:45:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdi67-0006Wa-5C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:45:08 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:51651) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdi67-0006WV-2e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:45:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdi65-0003xc-IY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:45:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdi61-0006SE-90 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:45:05 -0500 Received: from fragranza.investici.org ([178.175.144.26]:41642) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdi60-0006R0-TK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:45:01 -0500 Received: from [178.175.144.26] (fragranza [178.175.144.26]) (Authenticated sender: niasterisk@grrlz.net) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 807842C0135 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:44:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cryptolab.net; s=stigmate; t=1487097898; bh=FVaCGSf5E5otA5wGHv2qcxTMayfdM3yhnmtnsZtMIBc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=MNg5t8jEJvu+W3s4Iv91D/kWoq4bZwusVQGnQPImcGTSPRX1xqKxBrtON1NZ7P00x hdEq0Qp8gjIRhEFKbIOFC5zYfPT8vKelfighqqBKK6eGzECQ2AOfZyvi77iZrdPN69 kULgbQWRPAuTW+1D5ZwjDMTpb1KTvrhS99jF4BOE= Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:46:47 +0000 From: ng0 To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: colorforth Message-ID: <20170214184647.xxnuigw3yqp2iufn@wasp> Mail-Followup-To: guix-patches@gnu.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) In October I've sent a patch series where only one was picked from. I wanted to ask if there's an issue with colorforth? I will sent the patches again as soon as I have the bug id for this patch. Do as you please, if it's not worth for inclusion tell me and I drop the branch locally. -- ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/