[PATCH] guix: packages: Add comment on license field.

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • jgart
  • Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
jgart
Severity
normal
J
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)(name . jgart)(address . jgart@dismail.de)
20211021214055.21258-1-jgart@dismail.de
* guix/packages/packages.scm (package): Add comment about the type that
the license field expects as part of a package record.
---
guix/packages.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Toggle diff (15 lines)
diff --git a/guix/packages.scm b/guix/packages.scm
index 8c3a0b0b7b..d4f23f4a11 100644
--- a/guix/packages.scm
+++ b/guix/packages.scm
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ (define-record-type* <package>
(synopsis package-synopsis) ; one-line description
(description package-description) ; one or two paragraphs
- (license package-license)
+ (license package-license) ; <license> instance
(home-page package-home-page)
(supported-systems package-supported-systems ; list of strings
(default %supported-systems))
--
2.33.1
T
T
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote on 22 Oct 2021 00:06
(name . jgart)(address . jgart@dismail.de)
87pmry58uz.fsf@nckx
Jgart,

jgart via Guix-patches via ???
Toggle quote (3 lines)
> + (license package-license) ; <license>
> instance

Thanks!

It can also be a list of <license>s, which I tried to express as
well as I could within 30 characters…

As commit 886d04425e5a087816979b8a96b1e706693b5f93,

T G-R
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYXHk5A0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15rqMA/2blff8Hc5TmQ+1qkIOBlyrFqT12e1vWT+EGS1+F
Lc5bAQDRFHKuoMe7RGDtANRFy/cvoactYt8Rn1da4B9fyhhRBQ==
=e9Zi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

J
(name . Tobias Geerinckx-Rice)(address . me@tobias.gr)
20211021185010.GD27506@gac.attlocal.net
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:06:01 +0200 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> wrote:
Toggle quote (11 lines)
> Jgart,
>
> jgart via Guix-patches via ???
> > + (license package-license) ; <license>
> > instance
>
> Thanks!
>
> It can also be a list of <license>s, which I tried to express as
> well as I could within 30 characters…

Ah yes. Cool! Thanks for adding that and accepting the patch.

all best,

jgart
?