[wishlist] Make the GRUB installation procedure smarter

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • guixuser6392
  • muradm
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
guixuser6392
Severity
wishlist
G
G
guixuser6392 wrote on 27 Nov 2020 00:15
(name . bug-guix@gnu.org)(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
8xxH7oMlchpQqTKfkQXnJPhhoetZDQbFldlVKSNNlELUWA_WMMr3PLEjlUhsjrDQkWPwAinml4aAgLDArwcjehjdt0WrWOh9mPej2TxLgAE=@protonmail.com
Every time the operating system is instantiated the GRUB boot-loader is inexplicitly re-installed. This behaviour leads to unsolicited changes to the user's boot configuration on UEFI systems; and leads to unnecessary write operations on the ESP, and/or the MBR, which, in case they are abruptly aborted during the building of the install-bootloader derivation, can leave the system in an unbootable state. Futhermore, frequent writes to the platform's NV-RAM may negatively impact its lifespan.

NixOS stores the GRUB derivation as well as boot parameters in a state file, and only re-installs the boot-loader if the computed state is different from the stored state: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/modules/system/boot/loader/grub/install-grub.pl#L626.However, unless I am mistaken, that alone will not prevent GRUB from altering the user's boot configuration in a scenario, in which we want GRUB to be re-installed because it has received an update.

To summarize, I think that consecutive grub-install invocations should not be allowed to modify the user's boot configuration on UEFI systems, and that we should teach Guix to only re-install the boot-loader if the boot parameters has been changed and/or the GRUB package has been upgraded.

Although other boot-loaders are not in the scope of this wish, brining their installation procedures to the same high standard would be beneficial, too.
G
G
guixuser6392 wrote on 27 Nov 2020 21:00
(No Subject)
(name . 44898@debbugs.gnu.org)(address . 44898@debbugs.gnu.org)
Vp8ypMptITlAjAmOkZLYYREFpa5Yo_4vJ5vbi-gOgDMqE-xxYfYKW9NKVxRtlYb1Ojsfn-A_Ku9_xu3gIAOvBEAPd0SS8d_z6REsL-KORDs=@protonmail.com
I would like to clarify that whenever I wrote "boot parameters", I meant installation arguments passed to grub-install.
M
M
muradm wrote on 5 Sep 2021 03:27
RE: [wishlist] Make the GRUB installation procedure smarter
(address . 44898@debbugs.gnu.org)
875yvf94f1.fsf@muradm.net
First I was using Guix on Lenovo Carbon X1 in parallel with Arch.
Few times I experiences "NVRAM full" or similar problem, I don't
recall now. Solution was to reset NVRAM by some procedure. Half a
year now, I moved to System76 Lemur Pro, where I have only Guix
alone. Here I have another problem, sometimes it simply does not
boot, then I have to plug USB, and run grub-install manually to
recover.

As per discussion on IRC today, I would suggest the folowing
regarding grub efi, I'm not using other bootloaders, but I suppose
same logic may apply.

There are two things about grub:

1) /boot/efi/EFI/Guix/grubx64.efi & NVRAM - these are changing
very very rarely, only when grub version change, boot partition
change.

2) /boot/grub/* - these are changing only when grub version change
or new guix generation is created, then grub.cfg is getting
updated.

Currently, as far as I understand, both of them are getting
installed with one script from this derivation:
/gnu/store/...-install-bootloader.scm.drv

It could be split into two, one which runs grub-install, i.e. #1
above, the other which covers #2 above, let's say
bootloader-phase-1-install and bootloader-phase-2-install
respectively.

Then, each script can be executed only when derivation is
changing. With the following exceptions:
- must be executed anyway on "guix system init ..."
- must be executed only if "guix system reconfigure
--force-bootloader ..."

Scripts them selves store grub version (via absolute path), thus
if grub updated, derivations will change.

If for some reason, grub and/or nvram getting broken on boot, user
has to boot with some kind recovery media anyway.
?