Hello!
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
Toggle quote (17 lines)
> Hi Maxim,>> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:>>> In the second case, the build is started on the local machine instead of>> being dispatched to the offload machine. Presumably, this is done so>> that the files are available locally; but I'd prefer if it'd offload and>> keep the files on the remote. An alternative would be to copy the remote build directory>> locally after failure.>> Indeed, it’s a feature! :-) It was discussed here:>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/38312>> There we discussed the possibility of printing a warning, which wasn’t> implemented.
I see!
Toggle quote (2 lines)
> I’m closing in the meantime, but let me know what you think!
OK! I think I now see the technical difficulties in implementing auseful, offloaded interrupted build: the build artifacts, even if copiedlocally, would require syncing all the build time dependencies in orderto allow sourcing the "environment-variables" script and be able todebug. That's more the job of 'guix publish', not of 'guix offload'.
Maxim