[PATCH] build guile-static with guile-2.0

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Efraim Flashner
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • zimoun
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Efraim Flashner
Severity
normal
E
E
Efraim Flashner wrote on 12 Feb 2019 10:17
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)(address . 34427@debbugs.gnu.org)
20190212091740.GB3284@macbook41
When experimenting I found that using guile@2.0 as a base for
guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target
architecture.


--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> ????? ?????
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
Attachment: 0001-gnu-guile-static-Build-for-guile-2.0.patch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Ztlx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 16 Feb 2019 17:06
(name . Efraim Flashner)(address . efraim@flashner.co.il)
87mumvhg5u.fsf@gnu.org
Hi Efraim,

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> When experimenting I found that using guile@2.0 as a base for
> guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target
> architecture.

As discussed in https://issues.guix.info/issue/34427, I would rather
fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the
problem.

Ludo’.
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 12 Apr 2022 12:10
Re: bug#34453: [PATCH] build guile-static with guile-2.0
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
86o816394u.fsf_-_@gmail.com
Hi,

What is the status of this old patch #34453?



On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 17:06, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
Toggle quote (10 lines)
> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:
>
>> When experimenting I found that using guile@2.0 as a base for
>> guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target
>> architecture.
>
> As discussed in <https://issues.guix.info/issue/34427>, I would rather
> fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the
> problem.

Note that #34427 is still open.


Cheers,
simon
E
E
Efraim Flashner wrote on 13 Apr 2022 23:07
(name . zimoun)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)
Ylc7ezs6vG2ee5LE@pbp
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:10:09PM +0200, zimoun wrote:
Toggle quote (20 lines)
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of this old patch #34453?
>
> http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34453
>
>
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 17:06, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:
> >
> >> When experimenting I found that using guile@2.0 as a base for
> >> guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target
> >> architecture.
> >
> > As discussed in <https://issues.guix.info/issue/34427>, I would rather
> > fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the
> > problem.
>
> Note that #34427 is still open.

We can probably drop it. We'll pick it back up again if/when it comes up
again.

--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> ????? ?????
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=gEp1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 23 Jun 2022 10:14
(name . Efraim Flashner)(address . efraim@flashner.co.il)
86wnd794p9.fsf_-_@gmail.com
Hi,

On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 00:07, Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> wrote:
Toggle quote (13 lines)
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:10:09PM +0200, zimoun wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 17:06, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>> > Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:

>> > As discussed in <https://issues.guix.info/issue/34427>, I would rather
>> > fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the
>> > problem.
>>
>> Note that #34427 is still open.
>
> We can probably drop it. We'll pick it back up again if/when it comes up
> again.

Therefore, I am closing.


Cheers,
simon
Closed
?