no code for module (guix ui)

DoneSubmitted by Leo Famulari.
Details
2 participants
  • Leo Famulari
  • Ludovic Courtès
Owner
unassigned
Severity
normal
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 7 May 2016 04:59
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
20160507025936.GA25173@jasmine
From commit bdb2d56ee (gnu: mutt: Update to 1.6.1.), I applied a patchfrom guix-devel [0], tried to build a package, and got a backtrace asshown below.
I had rebuilt from the git tree recently, but I'm not sure exactly when.
It goes away after I rebuild.
---$ ./pre-inst-env guix build helloBacktrace: In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 157: 12 [catch #t #<catch-closure 19e4ba0> ...]In unknown file: ?: 11 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 19e4ba0>]In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 63: 10 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]In ice-9/eval.scm: 432: 9 [eval # #]In ice-9/boot-9.scm:2401: 8 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 1a01940 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]4050: 7 [#<procedure 1a01940 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]1724: 6 [%start-stack load-stack ...]1729: 5 [#<procedure 1a18ea0 ()>]In unknown file: ?: 4 [primitive-load "/gnu/store/9p7mf2a21c6a5k06jgbb9yg9abx7ilh9-guix-0.10.0-0.8062/bin/.guix-real"]In ice-9/eval.scm: 411: 3 [eval # #] 387: 2 [eval # #]In ice-9/boot-9.scm:2867: 1 [resolve-interface (guix ui) #:select ...]In unknown file: ?: 0 [scm-error misc-error #f "~A ~S" ("no code for module" (guix ui)) #f]
ERROR: In procedure scm-error:ERROR: no code for module (guix ui)---
[0] I've had this issue several times recently, without this patch.
It was this patch:http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-05/msg00204.html
It commits as 13416a10afdbad6546ef7943d93aba795ee5703b
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 8 May 2016 18:10
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)(address . 23475@debbugs.gnu.org)
87k2j45y59.fsf@gnu.org
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
Toggle quote (23 lines)> I had rebuilt from the git tree recently, but I'm not sure exactly when.>> It goes away after I rebuild.>> ---> $ ./pre-inst-env guix build hello> Backtrace: > In ice-9/boot-9.scm:> 157: 12 [catch #t #<catch-closure 19e4ba0> ...]> In unknown file:> ?: 11 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 19e4ba0>]> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:> 63: 10 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]> In ice-9/eval.scm:> 432: 9 [eval # #]> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:> 2401: 8 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 1a01940 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]> 4050: 7 [#<procedure 1a01940 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]> 1724: 6 [%start-stack load-stack ...]> 1729: 5 [#<procedure 1a18ea0 ()>]> In unknown file:> ?: 4 [primitive-load "/gnu/store/9p7mf2a21c6a5k06jgbb9yg9abx7ilh9-guix-0.10.0-0.8062/bin/.guix-real"]
Why is this file being loaded, instead of scripts/guix? Could it bethat scripts/guix was missing at that time?
Maybe it would be wise to apply a patch as attached to prevent suchsituations from arising. WDYT?
Thanks,Ludo’.
--- a/build-aux/pre-inst-env.in+++ b/build-aux/pre-inst-env.in@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ #!/bin/sh # GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU-# Copyright © 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>+# Copyright © 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> # # This file is part of GNU Guix. #@@ -68,4 +68,11 @@ export NIX_HASH GUIX_UNINSTALLED=1 export GUIX_UNINSTALLED +guix="$abs_top_builddir/scripts/guix"+if [ ! -x "$guix" ]+then+ echo "'$guix' is missing, please run 'make'." >&2+ exit 1+fi+ exec "$@"
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 22 May 2016 23:36
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)(address . 23475@debbugs.gnu.org)
8760u5pyft.fsf@gnu.org
Ping! :-)
Ludo’.
ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
Toggle quote (57 lines)> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:>>> I had rebuilt from the git tree recently, but I'm not sure exactly when.>>>> It goes away after I rebuild.>>>> --->> $ ./pre-inst-env guix build hello>> Backtrace: >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:>> 157: 12 [catch #t #<catch-closure 19e4ba0> ...]>> In unknown file:>> ?: 11 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 19e4ba0>]>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:>> 63: 10 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]>> In ice-9/eval.scm:>> 432: 9 [eval # #]>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:>> 2401: 8 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 1a01940 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]>> 4050: 7 [#<procedure 1a01940 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]>> 1724: 6 [%start-stack load-stack ...]>> 1729: 5 [#<procedure 1a18ea0 ()>]>> In unknown file:>> ?: 4 [primitive-load "/gnu/store/9p7mf2a21c6a5k06jgbb9yg9abx7ilh9-guix-0.10.0-0.8062/bin/.guix-real"]>> Why is this file being loaded, instead of scripts/guix? Could it be> that scripts/guix was missing at that time?>> Maybe it would be wise to apply a patch as attached to prevent such> situations from arising. WDYT?>> Thanks,> Ludo’.>> --- a/build-aux/pre-inst-env.in> +++ b/build-aux/pre-inst-env.in> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@> #!/bin/sh> > # GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU> -# Copyright © 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>> +# Copyright © 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>> #> # This file is part of GNU Guix.> #> @@ -68,4 +68,11 @@ export NIX_HASH> GUIX_UNINSTALLED=1> export GUIX_UNINSTALLED> > +guix="$abs_top_builddir/scripts/guix"> +if [ ! -x "$guix" ]> +then> + echo "'$guix' is missing, please run 'make'." >&2> + exit 1> +fi> +> exec "$@"
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 23 May 2016 05:22
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)(address . 23475@debbugs.gnu.org)
20160523032237.GA16312@jasmine
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:36:38PM +0200, Ludovic Court�s wrote:
Toggle quote (5 lines)> >> ?: 4 [primitive-load "/gnu/store/9p7mf2a21c6a5k06jgbb9yg9abx7ilh9-guix-0.10.0-0.8062/bin/.guix-real"]> >> > Why is this file being loaded, instead of scripts/guix? Could it be> > that scripts/guix was missing at that time?
It happened again, and scripts/guix was present. Next time I will take asnapshot of the broken state.
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 24 May 2016 23:59
control message for bug #23475
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87y46zazij.fsf@gnu.org
tags 23475 moreinfo
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 31 Jul 2016 18:40
Re: bug#23475: no code for module (guix ui)
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)(address . 23475@debbugs.gnu.org)
87r3a94v8f.fsf@gnu.org
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
Toggle quote (9 lines)> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:36:38PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:>> >> ?: 4 [primitive-load "/gnu/store/9p7mf2a21c6a5k06jgbb9yg9abx7ilh9-guix-0.10.0-0.8062/bin/.guix-real"]>> >>> > Why is this file being loaded, instead of scripts/guix? Could it be>> > that scripts/guix was missing at that time?>> It happened again, and scripts/guix was present. Next time I will take a> snapshot of the broken state.
Any updates? :-)
Ludo’.
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 2 Aug 2016 03:30
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)(address . 23475@debbugs.gnu.org)
20160802013047.GA3302@jasmine
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 06:40:00PM +0200, Ludovic Court�s wrote:
Toggle quote (2 lines)> Any updates? :-)
I've noticed that it happens if I do this:
$ guix gc && ./pre-inst-env guix build foo
If I then do the following, it works again:
$ guix environment guix$ exit$ ./pre-inst-env guix build foo
I don't have all of the Guix dependencies in my profile or my Debianenvironment (I see this on my Debian machine), so I guess that somethingimportant is garbage collected, but I haven't figured out what yet.
So, I think it's not much of a bug, since I am deliberately invoking thegarbage collector. WDYT?
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 2 Aug 2016 11:17
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)(address . 23475@debbugs.gnu.org)
87twf3zg1c.fsf@gnu.org
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
Toggle quote (20 lines)> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 06:40:00PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:>> Any updates? :-)>> I've noticed that it happens if I do this:>> $ guix gc && ./pre-inst-env guix build foo>> If I then do the following, it works again:>> $ guix environment guix> $ exit> $ ./pre-inst-env guix build foo >> I don't have all of the Guix dependencies in my profile or my Debian> environment (I see this on my Debian machine), so I guess that something> important is garbage collected, but I haven't figured out what yet.>> So, I think it's not much of a bug, since I am deliberately invoking the> garbage collector. WDYT?
Possibly. If you use ./configure -C, the ‘config.cache’ file also getsstale after GC. But even if you don’t, (guix config) might be referringto things that have been collected, so you have to:
rm -f config.cache && ./configure
I’m closing this bug, but do reopen it if you think something’s reallybroken. :-)
Thanks!
Ludo’.
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 3 Aug 2016 00:33
control message for bug #23475
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87k2fy7qd5.fsf@gnu.org
tags 23475 unreproducibleclose 23475
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send email to 23475@debbugs.gnu.org