libcue source tarball not bootstrapped

DoneSubmitted by Leo Famulari.
Details
3 participants
  • Andreas Enge
  • Leo Famulari
  • Ludovic Courtès
Owner
unassigned
Severity
normal
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 24 Dec 2015 18:34
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
20151224173450.GA19828@jasmine
Hi,
Can someone recommend a "template" email I can send to upstreamdevelopers requesting that they bootstrap their release tarballs?
libcue recently moved from sourceforge to github and it seems that theyhave forgotten to bootstrap the new tarballs. I'm not familiar enoughwith the Autotools system to know what to ask them to do.
A
A
Andreas Enge wrote on 27 Dec 2015 14:09
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)(address . 22232@debbugs.gnu.org)
20151227130946.GA14648@debian.fritz.box
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:34:50PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
Toggle quote (3 lines)> Can someone recommend a "template" email I can send to upstream> developers requesting that they bootstrap their release tarballs?
Here is what I sent recently to the numactl list: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.numa/951
Andreas
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 27 Dec 2015 15:45
(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)(address . 22232@debbugs.gnu.org)
20151227144511.GA370@jasmine
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 02:09:46PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
Toggle quote (7 lines)> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:34:50PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:> > Can someone recommend a "template" email I can send to upstream> > developers requesting that they bootstrap their release tarballs?> > Here is what I sent recently to the numactl list:> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.numa/951
Thank you! This is exactly the email I was looking for. I will adapt itas necessary.
Toggle quote (3 lines)> > Andreas>
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 29 Dec 2015 00:20
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)
87lh8e9n3i.fsf@gnu.org
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
Toggle quote (11 lines)> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 02:09:46PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:34:50PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:>> > Can someone recommend a "template" email I can send to upstream>> > developers requesting that they bootstrap their release tarballs?>> >> Here is what I sent recently to the numactl list:>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.numa/951>> Thank you! This is exactly the email I was looking for. I will adapt it> as necessary.
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 29 Dec 2015 02:36
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
20151229013621.GA15460@jasmine
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:20:49AM +0100, Ludovic Court�s wrote:
Toggle quote (16 lines)> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:> > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 02:09:46PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:> >> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:34:50PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:> >> > Can someone recommend a "template" email I can send to upstream> >> > developers requesting that they bootstrap their release tarballs?> >> > >> Here is what I sent recently to the numactl list:> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.numa/951> >> > Thank you! This is exactly the email I was looking for. I will adapt it> > as necessary.> > It might also be useful to point them at> <http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Basics-of-Distribution.html>.
It looks like upstream is preparing a new release that switches fromAutotools to CMake. I'll just wait for that. We can close this bug.
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 2 Jan 2016 21:47
control message for bug #22232
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
877fjrzp2t.fsf@gnu.org
tags 22232 notabug
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 2 Jan 2016 21:47
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
8760zbzp2k.fsf@gnu.org
close 22232 0.9.0+
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send email to 22232@debbugs.gnu.org