gnunet intermittently fails its test suite on all platforms

DoneSubmitted by Mark H Weaver.
Details
4 participants
  • Joshua Branson
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • Mark H Weaver
  • ng0
Owner
unassigned
Severity
normal
M
M
Mark H Weaver wrote on 15 Oct 2014 22:33
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
877g013wfe.fsf@netris.org
N
Re: bug #18742
(address . 18742@debbugs.gnu.org)(address . guix-devel@gnu.org)
877f9xjj9l.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> However you are replying to these bug reports is changing the "Subject" > line to only include the bug number. It's hard to know what the bug is > about...
I did not want to reply directly to these specific bugs, which is why Iasked on this list first.
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:38:03PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18742 > > > > Logs are gone since hydra got reset at least once since October 2014. I > [ 2 more citation lines. Click/Enter to show. ] > > can not see but only assume that the tests I am currently helping to fix > > are different tests than the ones which failed in 2014, as the test > > suite for GNUnet was refactored. > > Can we close this bug or should I reference this bug in an update commit > > if/when the test suite is fixed for Guix builds?
> It seems to be building or not building (depending on the architecture) > consistently. If you are happy with those results, please close the bug > :)
I think I can not do this, close bugs I did not create myself. If I amwrong about this I advise that we write a short appendum for Guixdocumentation (part: contributing, new subsection: reporting bugs) whichexplains debbugs usage, because upstream or at least the version+onlinehandbook on gnu.org is simply terrible in getting to the point.

> https://hydra.gnu.org/search?query=gnunet
Dependencies fail on architecture I do not have available (yet / in aforseeable future).
I think I'm okay with referencing this bug when/if I can close thecurrent failing test suite bug.-- ng0
N
(address . 18742@debbugs.gnu.org)(address . guix-devel@gnu.org)
87h98xv3r9.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is
ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com> writes:
Toggle quote (36 lines)> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:>> > However you are replying to these bug reports is changing the "Subject"> > line to only include the bug number. It's hard to know what the bug is> > about...>> I did not want to reply directly to these specific bugs, which is why I> asked on this list first.>> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:38:03PM +0000, ng0 wrote:> > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18742> > > > > > Logs are gone since hydra got reset at least once since October 2014. I> > [ 2 more citation lines. Click/Enter to show. ]> > > can not see but only assume that the tests I am currently helping to fix> > > are different tests than the ones which failed in 2014, as the test> > > suite for GNUnet was refactored.> > > Can we close this bug or should I reference this bug in an update commit> > > if/when the test suite is fixed for Guix builds?>> > It seems to be building or not building (depending on the architecture)> > consistently. If you are happy with those results, please close the bug> > :)>> I think I can not do this, close bugs I did not create myself. If I am> wrong about this I advise that we write a short appendum for Guix> documentation (part: contributing, new subsection: reporting bugs) which> explains debbugs usage, because upstream or at least the version+online> handbook on gnu.org is simply terrible in getting to the point.>>> > https://hydra.gnu.org/search?query=gnunet>> Dependencies fail on architecture I do not have available (yet / in a> forseeable future).
Related to this: what are affordable, powerful (should at least be ableto bootstrap any X11 based system) hardware systems for arm and mipswhere people build Guix on?
Toggle quote (7 lines)> I think I'm okay with referencing this bug when/if I can close the> current failing test suite bug.> -- > ng0>>
--
J
J
Joshua Branson wrote on 17 Mar 2017 20:42
gunner intermittently fails its test suit on all platforms
(name . 18742@debbugs.gnu.org)(address . 18742@debbugs.gnu.org)
DM5PR10MB1738BCD3E964CB642D44D359A6390@DM5PR10MB1738.namprd10.prod.outlook.com
This seems to be partially resolved. gnunet is now at version 0.10.1. And both i686 and X86_64 normally build correctly. Though there were two recent fails on both builds. mips64el is failing a lot. I don’t see a correct build yet. Joshua
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 24 Aug 2019 15:38
control message for bug #18742
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87wof2wuno.fsf@gnu.org
tags 18742 unreproducibleclose 18742quit
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send email to 18742@debbugs.gnu.org